Every system, classified against every law that applies to it.
Classify determines the risk tier and the exact obligations for each AI system across every framework in scope — generated from the registry record, in plain language, with the citation behind every decision.
Classification is where compliance teams stall.
An AI system can be high-risk under the EU AI Act, in scope of ISO/IEC 42001, subject to GDPR Article 22, and a consequential decision under the Colorado AI Act — all at once. Working that out by hand, per system, per framework, is where governance programmes either slow to a halt or quietly produce answers no one can defend.
A classification you cannot trace back to a clause and a fact in the registry is not a classification — it is an assertion. Boards and regulators ask for the reasoning, not the answer.
One engine. Every framework. Every system.
Classify runs the same decision logic across every framework you are in scope of, against the same registry record — so the answers are consistent, traceable, and current.
Classification is a view of the registry, not a separate database.
The registry is the source. Classify reads from it; documents, questionnaires, the trust page and monitoring all read from the same record — so the tier shown to the auditor matches the tier shown to the buyer matches the tier in your Annex IV file.
Classify once. Every framework in scope is decided against the same record.
The same registry record is classified against thirteen frameworks at once. Adding a new regime — a state law, a sector code — is a configuration change to the engine, not a rebuild of how your AI systems are described.
Bring a system. See the decisions, with the citations.
Pick one of your live AI systems. We'll register it on the call and show every framework decision it triggers — the tier, the obligations, and the clause behind each.