Hael
Sign inBook a demo
FRAMEWORK

Colorado AI Act

The first US state to impose comprehensive obligations on high-risk AI. Originally SB 24-205, now reshaped by SB 26-189 — effective January 2027, focused on preventing algorithmic discrimination in consequential decisions.

Coverage updated2 min ago
Coverage · Colorado AI Act
Framework coverage
82%
Coverage
5 core duties
Obligations mapped
+4% wk
5
Files on record
Live · synced 2 min ago · 7-day trend
Recent activity
Annex IV v4Approved
FRIA v2Approved
Monitoring plan v1Draft
THE OBLIGATION

Comprehensive duties on high-risk AI in consequential decisions.

Colorado's AI Act governs developers and deployers of high-risk AI — systems that are a substantial factor in consequential decisions in employment, housing, finance, healthcare, education, legal and government services. The duty centres on preventing algorithmic discrimination.

Deployers must run impact assessments, maintain a risk-management programme aligned to a recognised framework like NIST AI RMF or ISO 42001, disclose use to consumers, and report discovered discrimination to the Attorney General. The law was reshaped by SB 26-189 in 2026; the obligations below reflect the current direction.

At a glance
Applies toDevelopers and deployers of high-risk AI affecting Colorado residents
Your likely roleDeveloper and/or Deployer
Key deadlineEffective 1 January 2027 (per SB 26-189)
Penalty exposureEnforced by the Colorado Attorney General; violations treated as unfair trade practices
ARTEFACTS

The files this framework actually requires.

Colorado names impact assessments and a risk programme. Hael generates them and keeps them current.

Files · Evidence pack
PDFImpact Assessmentv3updated 2 min agoApproved
PDFRisk Management Programmev2updated 14 MayApproved
PDFAlgorithmic Discrimination Reviewv2updated 11 MayApproved
PDFConsumer Disclosure Noticev1updated 04 MayDraft
PDFSystem Inventoryv2updated 02 MayApproved

GRC tools tell you these are missing. Hael generates them — from each system's real configuration.

THE DIFFERENCE

A checklist tells you what's missing. Hael puts it on record.

A checklist flags a missing impact assessment. Hael generates it — aligned to the NIST or ISO programme Colorado recognises.

Typical GRC tool
Impact Assessmentupload required
Risk Management Programmeupload required
Algorithmic Discrimination Reviewupload required
Consumer Disclosure Noticeupload required
System Inventoryupload required

Tracks the gap. You still author every document.

Hael
Impact Assessmentv3Generated 2 min agoview
Risk Management Programmev2Generated · Approvedview
Algorithmic Discrimination Reviewv2Generated · Approvedview
Consumer Disclosure Noticev1Generated · Draftview
System Inventoryv2Generated · Approvedview

Generated from each system's real configuration, versioned, and kept current as it changes.

HOW HAEL WORKS

Discover, classify, produce — for Colorado AI Act.

01DISCOVER

Find the systems in Colorado AI Act scope, including embedded third-party AI.

Inventory · 14 systems
Credit scoring enginehigh
HR screening bothigh
Salesforce Einsteinlimited
02CLASSIFY

Assess each against Colorado AI Act's risk tiers and obligations.

Risk tier
Prohib.HighLimitedMin.
Role: ProviderArt. 9 · 11 · 14
03PRODUCE

Generate the Colorado AI Act records, versioned and current.

Generated files
Annex IV v4Approved
FRIA v2Approved
Monitoring v1Draft
COVERAGE

Every obligation, mapped to the control that satisfies it.

Rows are the framework's clauses.

Columns are the controls and files that satisfy them.

Cells update as the underlying configuration changes.

Coverage Map
Obligation → Control
4 obligations · 4 controls
82%
covered
Impact Assmt
Risk Prog.
Review
Disclosure
Impact assessment
Risk programme
Discrimination review
Consumer disclosure
Impact assessment
Impact Assmt
v3 · sealed
MAPPING

Clause by clause.

Obligation
What it requires
Hael control / file
Status
Pre-deployment & annual impact assessmentImpact assessment for high-risk AIImpact AssessmentApproved
Risk-management programmeAligned to NIST AI RMF or ISO/IEC 42001Risk Management ProgrammeApproved
Annual algorithmic-discrimination reviewReview of disparate impactAlgorithmic Discrimination ReviewIn progress
Consumer notice for consequential decisionsPlain-language pre-use noticeConsumer Disclosure NoticeDraft
REUSE

Author once. Satisfy many.

Colorado explicitly recognises NIST AI RMF and ISO/IEC 42001 as the basis for its required risk programme — so the work you do for those frameworks directly satisfies Colorado, and overlaps the EU AI Act.

→ shared evidenceNIST AI RMFISO/IEC 42001EU AI Act
Trust & Security
SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001EU & US data residencySSO / SCIMEncryption in transit & at restAudit logging

On record before January 2027, not scrambling after.

Colorado's high-risk AI duties take effect January 1, 2027. Hael produces the impact assessments and risk programme the law requires.