Clinical-grade AI governance, evidenced.
AI now touches triage, diagnostics, utilisation and patient communication. Each use sits under overlapping AI, privacy and clinical-oversight rules — and the bar for evidence is high.
AI in care decisions carries the heaviest evidence burden of any sector.
Healthcare AI rarely sits in one regime. A diagnostic-support model can engage the EU AI Act's high-risk rules, GDPR/HIPAA-equivalent privacy duties, ADMT obligations, and clinical human-oversight laws at once. Regulators and clinical-governance boards expect documented oversight, validation and risk assessment — not assurances.
Hael generates the impact assessments, oversight records and data-governance evidence each of these regimes demands, and keeps them current as models change.
Built for the regimes clinical AI actually triggers.
Impact assessments, human-oversight records and risk documentation for the high-risk classification clinical AI usually attracts.
Reuse one data-governance base across GDPR, ADMT and AI-Act data duties — instead of separate privacy and AI workstreams.
Records that show a clinician stays in the loop — the control regulators and clinical-governance boards look for first.
Govern clinical AI across AI, privacy and oversight rules from a single evidence base.
One record. Mapped to the obligations that apply. Versioned, sealed, current — and ready the moment a regulator, auditor or enterprise buyer asks.
The regulations you actually face.
Defensible clinical AI — under any regime that asks.
Hael generates the impact assessments, oversight records and data-governance evidence clinical AI demands, and keeps them current as models change.